Test pricing page layouts with different tier arrangements, feature comparisons, and CTA placements. A/B test pricing presentations visually.
Pricing Page Tester renders your pricing tiers in several layouts at once. You enter tier names, prices, feature lists, and a CTA label once; each variant lays that same content out differently - which tier comes first, which is highlighted, how the feature comparison reads, where the button sits. The common mistake is reading 'A/B test' as a live experiment: nothing here measures visitors or conversions. It is a visual comparison only, for deciding which presentation to ship or which variants deserve a real test.
A concrete input and expected output from the current implementation.
Input
Basic $9/mo: 1 project, 10 GB storage, email support. Pro $19/mo: 10 projects, 100 GB storage, priority support. Business $49/mo: unlimited projects, 1 TB storage, dedicated support. CTA: 'Start free trial'. Highlight: Pro.
Expected output
A side-by-side grid of variants. Every variant shows the same three tiers, the same prices, the same feature lists, and the same CTA label; only the presentation differs. One variant centers Pro with a 'Most popular' badge and a slightly larger card; another lists the tiers in order with no highlight; a third places the CTA button above the feature list rather than below it.
The tool holds the content fixed and varies only presentation, so the differences you see are exactly the layout decisions under test: emphasis, tier order, and CTA position. The prices stay internally consistent ($9, $19, $49, with features ascending in every variant).
The tool separates content from presentation. The tiers, prices, features, and CTA label you enter become one shared data set, and every variant renders from that same data, so two variants differ only in arrangement and emphasis, never in what they claim. Enter the copy exactly as you would ship it; the data stays in the browser.
The tool renders the supported arrangements side by side: tier order, highlighted tier, feature-comparison style, and CTA placement. With no visitor data involved, the comparison is about what a scan of the page reveals - which variant draws the eye to the tier you want to sell and makes feature differences legible at a glance.
No. The tool compares presentations visually; it does not serve pages to visitors or report conversion rates. That requires a real A/B test on your live site with enough traffic. What you get here is a shortlist - a defensible reason to test two or three arrangements rather than guessing.
Enter the tiers you are actually shipping; three is a typical lineup. More tiers add columns to every variant, and the layout differences get harder to judge. Settle the tier set and prices first - this tool tests presentation, not the pricing model itself.
The example and behavioral notes were checked against the browser implementation. Standards and primary references below define the relevant format, formula, or platform behavior.
Shorten URLs with local redirect tracking via localStorage. See click counts and generate a QR code for each link.
Build UTM-tagged URLs for campaign tracking with source, medium, campaign, term, and content parameters.
Enter 2+ headlines and see simulated previews in Google results, email subject lines, and social posts side-by-side.
Count characters for Twitter/X, LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram with platform-specific limits and warnings.
Calculate click-through rates from impressions and clicks with industry benchmarks and trend analysis.
Check email subject line length against best practices for desktop and mobile with preview text optimization.