b2KIT

Magnetic Field Converter

Convert tesla, gauss, oersted, and ampere per meter for magnetic field calculations.

Tested tool guide Tested browser tools Checked August 16, 2026

What Magnetic Field Converter does, with a checked example

Enter a magnetic-field value, identify its current unit, and select tesla, gauss, oersted, or ampere per meter as the destination. The converter applies direct unit relationships within magnetic flux density or field strength and expresses cross-family results as free-space equivalents. The important distinction is that these four units do not all measure the same physical quantity. Tesla and gauss describe magnetic flux density B, while oersted and ampere per meter describe magnetic field strength H. Material permeability matters whenever a conversion crosses from B to H.

Worked example

A concrete input and expected output from the current implementation.

Input

1 tesla to gauss

Expected output

10000 gauss

One gauss is exactly 0.0001 tesla. Dividing 1 tesla by 0.0001 gives 10,000 gauss.

How the result is produced

1

Flux density conversion

Tesla (T) and gauss (G) both express magnetic flux density B. Their scale relationship is exact: 1 T equals 10,000 G, so conversion shifts the decimal point four places. No information about the field source or surrounding material is needed for this pair because both units describe the same physical quantity.

2

Field strength and permeability

Ampere per meter (A/m) and oersted (Oe) express field strength H. The conventional unit relationship is 1 Oe equals 1000/(4*pi) A/m, approximately 79.5775 A/m. Connecting H to B uses B = mu H. Vacuum permeability gives a free-space equivalent. A material-specific conversion needs the relevant permeability, which can change with operating conditions.

Good uses

  • Translate a laboratory field measurement stated in tesla into gauss before comparing it with the range or resolution of a gaussmeter.
  • Convert an electromagnet specification from oersted to amperes per meter for use in an SI-based worksheet, report, or simulation input.
  • Compare magnetic-component datasheets that report flux density in gauss but field strength in oersted, while keeping B and H clearly distinguished.

Limits and checks

  • A tesla-to-A/m or gauss-to-oersted result is not independent of physical context. Without material permeability, it should be read as a free-space-equivalent value.
  • Gauss and oersted can appear with matching numerical values in vacuum-oriented cgs calculations, but this does not make B and H interchangeable inside magnetic material.
  • One permeability value may be inadequate for nonlinear, anisotropic, or hysteretic materials. The converter cannot replace a B-H curve or operating-point data for such materials.

Common questions

Are gauss and oersted the same unit?

No. Gauss measures magnetic flux density B, whereas oersted measures magnetic field strength H. Their numerical values are commonly paired one-for-one for vacuum in cgs usage, which causes confusion. In matter, magnetization changes the relationship. Do not substitute one for the other unless the physical context supplies the required vacuum or permeability assumption.

Can I convert a magnet's tesla rating directly to amperes per meter?

Only with an assumption about permeability. Tesla is a B unit and A/m is an H unit, so B = mu H must connect them. A free-space conversion uses vacuum permeability and is useful as an equivalent field value. It may not represent H inside a permanent magnet, magnetic core, shield, or other material.

References and verification

The example and behavioral notes were checked against the browser implementation. Standards and primary references below define the relevant format, formula, or platform behavior.

Related Tools