b2KIT

Altman Z-Score Calculator

Calculate Altman Z-Score for bankruptcy risk assessment from working capital, retained earnings, EBIT, equity, and revenue ratios.

Tested tool guide Tested browser tools Checked August 16, 2026

What Altman Z-Score Calculator does, with a checked example

The Altman Z-Score is a bankruptcy screen built from five ratios: working capital, retained earnings, EBIT, and sales each divided by total assets, plus market value of equity divided by total liabilities, weighted 1.2, 1.4, 3.3, 0.6, and 1.0, then summed. Above 2.99 is the safe zone, below 1.81 the distress zone, and in between the grey zone. What surprises most users: the model was calibrated on US public manufacturing firms in 1968, so private companies, banks, and startups sit outside its scope, and the zone cutoffs come from that one sample, not from any measured probability of failure.

Worked example

A concrete input and expected output from the current implementation.

Input

working capital 200000, total assets 1000000, retained earnings 250000, EBIT 120000, market value of equity 900000, total liabilities 500000, sales 1500000

Expected output

Z = 3.57 - safe zone (above 2.99)

The ratios are 0.20, 0.25, 0.12, 1.80, and 1.50, so Z = 1.2(0.20) + 1.4(0.25) + 3.3(0.12) + 0.6(1.80) + 1.0(1.50) = 0.24 + 0.35 + 0.396 + 1.08 + 1.50 = 3.57, which clears the 2.99 safe-zone threshold.

How the result is produced

1

The formula and its weights

Z = 1.2(X1) + 1.4(X2) + 3.3(X3) + 0.6(X4) + 1.0(X5), where X1 is working capital over total assets, X2 retained earnings over total assets, X3 EBIT over total assets, X4 market value of equity over total liabilities, and X5 sales over total assets. EBIT carries the heaviest weight at 3.3, so profitability dominates the score, while the working-capital and retained-earnings terms contribute least.

2

The zones

The total is compared with two cutoffs from Altman's 1968 sample: above 2.99 is the safe zone, between 1.81 and 2.99 the grey zone, below 1.81 the distress zone. Because every ratio divides by total assets or liabilities, the score is scale-free, so firms of very different sizes are compared on the same terms. All five inputs must come from the same reporting period.

Good uses

  • Screen a customer or supplier before extending trade credit, using the figures from its latest annual report.
  • Chart a target company's score over the last three years before an acquisition to see whether distress is deepening, not just where it sits today.
  • Benchmark one public manufacturer against an industry peer, since the scale-free ratios make scores across company sizes roughly comparable.

Limits and checks

  • Scope: the classic model fits public manufacturing firms. Private firms call for the revised Z'-Score, which uses book equity with its own weights and thresholds; banks, insurers, and pre-revenue startups are outside the model family entirely.
  • Not a probability: 1.81 and 2.99 are sample cutoffs from a single 1968 study. A grey-zone firm is not 'likely to fail', and a company can sit in the distress zone for years without failing.
  • X4 is market value of equity: a falling share price drags the score down even when operations are unchanged, and substituting book value into X4 produces a number the model was never calibrated to produce.

Common questions

Does a score below 1.81 mean the company will go bankrupt?

No. The zones are cutoffs from Altman's 1968 sample of US manufacturers, not failure odds. The score is a relative-risk screen: lower means riskier within the model's scope, but companies can trade in the distress zone for years, and for firms outside that scope, such as banks or private companies, even the direction of the signal can mislead.

Can I use book value of equity when the market value is not available?

Not in the classic formula. X4 calls for market value of equity, and substituting book value changes both the number and what it means. For a private firm, use the revised Z'-Score, which is built on book equity with its own weights and thresholds. If this calculator does not offer that variant, treat the output as approximate.

References and verification

The example and behavioral notes were checked against the browser implementation. Standards and primary references below define the relevant format, formula, or platform behavior.

Related Tools